Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

How Obama can make his pivot to Asia a lasting one

The unprecedented gathering of South-east Asian leaders in California this week can be seen as a significant achievement for Mr Barack Obama’s oft-dismissed “pivot” to Asia. Now, the president needs to lay down a framework to sustain and deepen US engagement with the region, well after he leaves office.

While it would serve little purpose for Mr Obama to publicly scold regional leaders this week, he can and should reiterate US support for the rule of law and democratic values. Photo: AP

While it would serve little purpose for Mr Obama to publicly scold regional leaders this week, he can and should reiterate US support for the rule of law and democratic values. Photo: AP

Follow TODAY on WhatsApp

The unprecedented gathering of South-east Asian leaders in California this week can be seen as a significant achievement for Mr Barack Obama’s oft-dismissed “pivot” to Asia. Now, the president needs to lay down a framework to sustain and deepen US engagement with the region, well after he leaves office.

Mr Obama, to be sure, can hardly take full credit for the meeting. Recent actions by China — especially its maritime claims in the South China Sea — have driven several members of the Association of South-east Asian Nations (ASEAN) to sidle closer to the US. It is entirely possible that leaders in Beijing will find a way to recalibrate their approach, and even more likely that the next American president will be distracted by the morass in the Middle East. China’s standard argument to South-east Asia — that the US is a distant and unreliable partner — remains persuasive.

Only steady, consistent engagement can overcome doubts about US staying power. After some early stumbles, Mr Obama has set a good precedent by committing the US to several regional meetings, which should forge stronger bonds well into the future.

At the same time, more can be done to institutionalise closer ties with South-east Asia, a US$2.2 trillion (S$3.08 trillion) market situated in a geopolitically crucial part of the world. So far, five years after the idea was raised by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, no official document lays out the scope and priorities of America’s Asia “rebalance.” Such vagueness has generated considerable confusion (and, occasional derision). More important, to be credible, the US will need to put real money behind the strategic shift — and that will be easier to do if diplomatic and military priorities are laid out in black and white.

Mr Obama also has an opportunity to bind the US economy closer to those in South-east Asia. Four ASEAN members have already signed on to the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines have expressed interest in joining. And the US has promised to help them raise standards and streamline regulations as the pact requires.

ASEAN, as a whole, is already the top destination for US investment in Asia — amounting to $226 billion at the end of last year, more than that from China, Japan and South Korea combined. That’s a strong base to build upon. A new plan will set up US liaison offices in Singapore, Jakarta and Bangkok, to work with regional governments to deepen investment and trade ties. That will allow American experts, for instance, to help countries such as Laos and Myanmar develop more bankable infrastructure projects.

In the long run, the US has an interest in promoting not just open markets in the region, but also open societies, something that young South-east Asians — two-thirds of the region’s population is under 35 — can be expected to demand.

While it would serve little purpose for Mr Obama to publicly scold regional leaders this week, he can and should reiterate US support for the rule of law and democratic values. Meanwhile, the administration should look for more concrete ways to encourage local media, youth leaders and civil groups to change their societies from within.

Above all, the US will need to be realistic. In building closer ties to South-east Asia, the goal is not to lessen China’s influence per se. ASEAN members have every reason to take advantage of the mainland’s markets and investment. The priority should be to establish a transparent, rules-based order, that enables the free flow of commerce and reinforces stability. That would be a benefit to all countries concerned. BLOOMBERG

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to get daily news updates, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.